From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <912ce27c52ab8df208513643c7e54193@quanstro.net>
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 12:28:53 -0500
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] dir tree Qs
In-Reply-To: <44E4A5EF.7060709@lanl.gov>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Topicbox-Message-UUID: a25c0f36-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

not to throw a monkey wrench in your taxonomy, but
what about /mail/fs?

- erik

On Thu Aug 17 12:26:41 CDT 2006, rminnich@lanl.gov wrote:
> rog@vitanuova.com wrote:
> >>/n is remote servers. /mnt/is local.
> > 
> > 
> > /mnt/term ?
> 
> yeah, I think that is a tenuous claim (/mnt vs. /n)
> 
> I always figured it was that stuff in /mnt was supposed to be in /mnt, 
> otherwise if it was in /n, it was supposed to be in /n?
> 
> ron