9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Deztroyer-a1 <alex-sci@freenet.co.nz>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: [9fans] Re: Future of Plan9
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 09:49:14 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <919uta$3jfnv$1@ID-64718.news.dfncis.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xbIZ5.157945$e5.114349@newsfeeds.bigpond.com>

One thing I can be sure is that plan 9 won't be as popular as linux. It is
because the design on plan9; It is a distributed computing environment
rather than a client/server one. Be sure to check out the official web site
of plan 9, you might found some more interesting stuff on there.

Future of plan 9? In my opinion, with a little modification on Plan 9, it'll
be great. However, plan 9 is just the same as concorde; not a very succesful
commerical product I think. However, I enjoy using plan 9 myself. It's a
little bit too "scientific" if it is to server as a commerical product.

There're heaps of web page in plan 9 (the play one), I don't see much on the
one you're talking about (OS) though :-) Check out the links on the web site
of plan 9 on bell labs's server. I think they've got some links over there,
I think.

People use linux because it can be serve as a personal computer. That's the
original design of unix. All those features that are available in linux/unix
are added onto the system afterwards. Plan 9 and linux/unix are in different
design. If you're looking for a personal computing enviroment, linux/unix
will do the job better (as they've got more applications and stuff like
that). You're into distributed computing? have a go on plan 9 then.

I've heard that Red Hat linux is gonna develop a distributed version of
linux. Not sure whether it is as good as plan 9 or not. But I'll always
stand on the side of plan 9. As I am not very into linux.

Good Luck

Alexander C. Deztroyer
Stephen Adam <saadam@bigpond.com> wrote in message
news:xbIZ5.157945$e5.114349@newsfeeds.bigpond.com...
> Hi all...  I was completely ignorant of the existence of Plan9 until a few
> days ago.  It looks very interesting...
>
> Has anyone done an analysis of its long term prospects?  I'd love to read
> about that.
>
> How many large Plan9 sites are active?
>
> Thanks,


  reply	other threads:[~2000-12-14  9:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2000-12-13 10:49 [9fans] " Stephen Adam
2000-12-14  9:49 ` Deztroyer-a1 [this message]
2000-12-14 12:05   ` [9fans] " Boyd Roberts
2000-12-19  9:57   ` Randolph Fritz
2000-12-19 16:07     ` vecera
2000-12-20  0:58       ` Steve Kilbane
2000-12-20 18:59         ` William Staniewicz
2000-12-21  9:44           ` Alexander C. Deztroyer
2000-12-21 18:27             ` Andrew Zubinski
2000-12-21  9:45         ` vecera
2000-12-22  0:04           ` Steve Kilbane
2000-12-20  9:59       ` Alexander C. Deztroyer
2000-12-20 10:00       ` Patrick R. Wade
2000-12-20  9:59     ` Alexander C. Deztroyer
2000-12-19 10:48 forsyth
2000-12-21 17:46 anothy
2000-12-23 13:21 ` Steve Kilbane
2000-12-24  1:21   ` Boyd Roberts
2001-01-02 17:52     ` Chris Locke
2000-12-21 18:25 forsyth
2000-12-21 18:30 Russ Cox
2000-12-21 18:33 ` matt
2000-12-21 19:20 forsyth
2000-12-22  9:20 ` cLIeNUX user
2000-12-21 19:21 forsyth
2000-12-21 20:48 ` matt
2000-12-22 11:32 forsyth
2001-01-02 17:24 ` cLIeNUX user
2000-12-22 14:00 forsyth
2000-12-22 22:13 ` Boyd Roberts
2000-12-23 14:40 rob pike
2000-12-24  1:51 Russ Cox
2000-12-24  1:55 ` Boyd Roberts
2000-12-24  2:03 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-01-02 16:51 ` Dan Cross
2000-12-24  2:11 Russ Cox
2000-12-24  2:18 ` Boyd Roberts
2000-12-24 15:46   ` matt heath
2000-12-25  5:47 ` Anthony Starks
2001-01-02 17:36 ` Randolph Fritz
2001-01-02 17:36 ` cLIeNUX user
2001-01-02 17:42 ` Anssi Porttikivi
2001-01-03  1:19 William Staniewicz
2001-01-02 22:43 ` matt heath
2001-01-08  9:54 ` Ross Evans
2003-02-10 17:01 [9fans] " Jaytee
2003-02-11  9:30 ` [9fans] " Douglas A. Gwyn
2003-02-11 13:06   ` Jim Choate
2003-02-11 13:19     ` Russ Cox
2003-02-11 13:32       ` Jim Choate
2003-02-11 14:11     ` Fco.J.Ballesteros
2003-02-12  4:31       ` Jim Choate
2003-02-12  5:12         ` Andrew
2003-02-12 10:34         ` matt
2003-02-12 11:46           ` Digby Tarvin
2003-02-12 17:17         ` Sam
2003-02-12 20:58           ` adrian Damn it !
2003-02-12 21:00             ` Matt Keeler
2003-02-11 14:35     ` Ronald G. Minnich
2003-02-11 16:04     ` Dan Cross
2003-02-11 17:05       ` matt
2003-02-12  9:52     ` ozan s yigit
2003-02-12 18:23   ` north_
2003-02-11 15:01 bwc
2003-02-12  0:42 okamoto
2003-02-12 21:10 bwc

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='919uta$3jfnv$1@ID-64718.news.dfncis.de' \
    --to=alex-sci@freenet.co.nz \
    --cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).