From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <922b610f917e15678e287488acf26e31@csplan9.rit.edu>
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 22:32:45 -0400
From: john@csplan9.rit.edu
In-Reply-To: <f180089e20635a24074f865e8c4c9dd5@quanstro.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] sad commentary
Topicbox-Message-UUID: cc259fd8-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> this slashdot article almost asks for cpu
> functionality for plan 9 by name.
>
> http://ask.slashdot.org/askslashdot/08/06/29/1417247.shtml
>
> not a single mention of plan 9.  i hope
> this is an indication that slashdot has
> slipped.
>
> screens?  1978 called and wants its
> terminal server mentality back.
>
> - erik

cpu is not persistent, at least not in the way
he wants it.

John