From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <9241c6d862536673c767d4d1df999a0d@quanstro.net>
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 11:11:35 -0400
To: 9fans@9fans.net
In-Reply-To: <13426df10904180807k29e2a188y9a5d93bb37540c04@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] Plan9 - the next 20 years
Topicbox-Message-UUID: e5aa92fa-ead4-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Sat Apr 18 11:08:21 EDT 2009, rminnich@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 6:50 AM, erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net> wrote:
>
> > in a plan 9 system, the only files that i can think of which many processes
> > have open at the same time are log files, append-only files.  just reopening
> > log file would solve the problem.
>
> you're not thinking in terms of parallel applications if you make this
> statement.

you're right.  i assume you specificly mean hpc things.  the gulf between hpc
and anything else is pretty big.

- erik