From: Charles Forsyth <forsyth@terzarima.net>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] slow performance
Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 21:26:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <93578bee964f44a86003b1e0a06a3a71@terzarima.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e510e47e0704011311l44b7753ay1e80d6c62f04c79@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 508 bytes --]
then there is some confusion, because when i run your program
as-is (except for the bug fix) on my Plan 9 system, i get roughly the 2+ seconds you
mentioned as the time for the Linux system, and that also compares
with the time i get when i run the same code on a Linux system. i can only get 20+ seconds
on Plan 9 IF i have the program do the unbuffered print AND redirect to a file system across the
network (if i do the unbuffered print and send the output to /dev/null, it's still about 2 seconds).
[-- Attachment #2: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 4160 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 219 bytes --]
Ok, but when i'd test the program with 'time program' i do comment the print
line, so the program was only sorting the things into the data structure,
not printing it..
even i need to consider the print function?
[-- Attachment #2.1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 243 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-01 20:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-31 16:41 pedro henrique antunes de oliveira
2007-03-31 16:48 ` Lorenzo Fernando Bivens de la Fuente
2007-03-31 16:48 ` Charles Forsyth
2007-03-31 16:57 ` pedro henrique antunes de oliveira
2007-03-31 16:55 ` W B Hacker
2007-03-31 17:12 ` Uriel
2007-03-31 19:27 ` W B Hacker
2007-03-31 23:20 ` erik quanstrom
2007-03-31 23:35 ` pedro henrique antunes de oliveira
2007-04-01 1:40 ` erik quanstrom
2007-03-31 17:15 ` Charles Forsyth
2007-03-31 18:50 ` Armando Camarero
2007-03-31 21:05 ` C H Forsyth
2007-03-31 23:25 ` pedro henrique antunes de oliveira
2007-04-01 1:32 ` erik quanstrom
2007-04-01 9:22 ` Charles Forsyth
2007-04-01 9:52 ` pedro henrique antunes de oliveira
2007-04-01 9:56 ` pedro henrique antunes de oliveira
2007-04-01 18:24 ` ron minnich
2007-04-01 19:11 ` pedro henrique antunes de oliveira
2007-04-01 19:26 ` geoff
2007-04-01 19:57 ` pedro henrique antunes de oliveira
2007-04-01 20:07 ` Charles Forsyth
2007-04-01 20:11 ` pedro henrique antunes de oliveira
2007-04-01 20:26 ` Charles Forsyth [this message]
2007-04-01 21:13 ` ISHWAR RATTAN
2007-04-02 1:52 ` pedro henrique antunes de oliveira
2007-04-01 12:08 erik quanstrom
2007-04-01 12:35 ` pedro henrique antunes de oliveira
2007-04-01 14:39 ` Uriel
2007-04-01 15:11 ` C H Forsyth
2007-04-01 17:35 ` pedro henrique antunes de oliveira
2007-04-01 18:05 ` erik quanstrom
2007-04-02 9:14 phao
2007-04-02 9:31 ` Anselm R. Garbe
2007-04-02 9:38 ` Charles Forsyth
2007-04-02 9:42 ` C H Forsyth
2007-04-02 9:45 ` Anselm R. Garbe
2007-04-02 12:49 ` pedro henrique antunes de oliveira
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=93578bee964f44a86003b1e0a06a3a71@terzarima.net \
--to=forsyth@terzarima.net \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).