From: dante <subscriptions@posteo.eu>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Plan9 Sources Repository
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2014 14:02:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <936f17215bd57185dd20a0a3cfa9165c@posteo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f9be6c8f12db5d56b71c7ac6beab8529@posteo.de>
This was an unfair statement from you, pmarin.
You make me answer twice.
I did not imply anywhere that I proposed the bazaar model (whatever
that is, no one wants the Linux .
Scalability is also possible in projects maintained by a central
authority.
My whole argument goes about the following hypotheses:
1. increasing the amount of contributions may not scale in the current
model.
2. submitting trivial contributions is not trivial for the contributor.
Kind Regards,
Dante
On 19.07.2014 13:51, dante wrote:
> On 19.07.2014 13:49, pmarin wrote:
>> Plan9 in general doesn't follow the Bazaar model ( the current usual
>> way of doing things ).
> And this might lead to the problems pointed in my previous mails.
> Or not, I might be wrong.
> Kind Regards,
> Dante
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-19 12:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-18 13:19 dante
2014-07-18 14:14 ` Aram Hăvărneanu
2014-07-18 14:18 ` cam
2014-07-18 14:36 ` erik quanstrom
2014-07-19 9:31 ` dante
2014-07-19 11:20 ` Riddler
2014-07-19 11:50 ` dante
2014-07-19 11:49 ` pmarin
2014-07-19 11:51 ` dante
2014-07-19 12:02 ` dante [this message]
2014-07-19 19:06 ` Anthony Sorace
2014-07-20 0:12 ` Brian L. Stuart
2014-07-20 7:33 ` dante
2014-07-19 12:03 ` tlaronde
2014-07-19 12:12 ` dante
2014-07-19 14:41 ` erik quanstrom
2014-07-19 15:06 ` dante
2014-07-19 15:11 ` Jacob Todd
2014-07-19 15:49 ` dante
2014-07-19 18:00 ` Kurt H Maier
2014-07-19 23:19 ` Brian L. Stuart
2014-07-19 18:17 ` erik quanstrom
2014-07-19 19:20 ` Christopher Nielsen
2014-07-19 20:13 ` Aram Hăvărneanu
2014-07-19 22:10 ` dante
2014-07-19 22:30 ` erik quanstrom
2014-07-20 7:33 ` dante
2014-07-19 22:54 ` Brian L. Stuart
2014-07-19 17:31 ` hiro
2014-07-19 17:48 ` dante
2014-07-19 15:03 ` Aram Hăvărneanu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=936f17215bd57185dd20a0a3cfa9165c@posteo.de \
--to=subscriptions@posteo.eu \
--cc=9fans@9fans.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).