From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2014 14:02:48 +0200 From: dante To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> In-Reply-To: References: <1fc1c403eaecd8cae89f761a68b0d605@posteo.de> Message-ID: <936f17215bd57185dd20a0a3cfa9165c@posteo.de> User-Agent: Posteo Webmail Subject: Re: [9fans] Plan9 Sources Repository Topicbox-Message-UUID: 06681c7a-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 This was an unfair statement from you, pmarin. You make me answer twice. I did not imply anywhere that I proposed the bazaar model (whatever that is, no one wants the Linux . Scalability is also possible in projects maintained by a central authority. My whole argument goes about the following hypotheses: 1. increasing the amount of contributions may not scale in the current model. 2. submitting trivial contributions is not trivial for the contributor. Kind Regards, Dante On 19.07.2014 13:51, dante wrote: > On 19.07.2014 13:49, pmarin wrote: >> Plan9 in general doesn't follow the Bazaar model ( the current usual >> way of doing things ). > And this might lead to the problems pointed in my previous mails. > Or not, I might be wrong. > Kind Regards, > Dante