From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <93b0889692ef974561c174f7b857b343@plan9.escet.urjc.es>
From: Fco.J.Ballesteros <nemo@plan9.escet.urjc.es>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] df for fossil?
In-Reply-To: <27e4ae2fbf975f23cfde59e10f1f8d67@plan9.bell-labs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 16:57:58 +0100
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 410e4876-eacb-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

I'm confussed.
If you said that the fossil in sources is already reserving those
two blocks for that purpose, then I didn't understand it right and I'll
delete the rescue kernel I just made.

If you said instead that fossil should reserve those two blocks but it's
not doing so yet, then I think that means `as of today there're some times
when it would allow you to run snap -a'. 

But in any case, I'm running right now with the sources as of yesterday night (madrid
time), and a pull this morning got nothing new for fossil.

Maybe I just need a coffee :-)