From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 20:24:08 -0400
To: corey@bitworthy.net, 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <93b909d2c8147deb5026860ed6cf0c5b@ladd.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <201003291720.32633.corey@bitworthy.net>
References: <138575261003230627kb81c42q7710df1af4283919@mail.gmail.com>
	<201003291358.56753.corey@bitworthy.net>
	<34cb9c5c75eebb8db65b0d7da5b0cbe1@ladd.quanstro.net>
	<201003291720.32633.corey@bitworthy.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] Plan ? (was: native install)
Topicbox-Message-UUID: f81b6fd0-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> Heheh... when it's critical of other existing projects and systems -
> which goes on all the time here - it's o.k.; but when it's critical of
> plan 9, it's known as 'trolling'.
>
> <wink>
>

actually, yes.

> > i find plan 9 to be a very effective environment.  i use it
> > all day, every day.
> >
> > if you don't, the logical choices are to (a) do something about
> > it or (b) do something else.
> >
>
> In any given social environment, communicating dissatisfaction of
> the status quo is often the logical first step towards choices (a)
> and/or (b) - due to the fact that going off on one's own to work
> alone in a vacuum on a major undertaking is generally recognized
> as an inherently ill-fated strategy.

except that these same arguments have been going on for as long
as i have read this list and no one has done anything about it.
after 15+ years, i think it's fair to ask "where's the beef?"

- erik