From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <94150691419a95546ac0d4bd0e2dbc61@caldo.demon.co.uk>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] Machine-specific cpurc customisation?
From: Charles Forsyth <forsyth@caldo.demon.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <1a00bd74118a0aacdc816bb3158aa117@plan9.escet.urjc.es>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 11:13:23 +0100
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 6f3af068-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

i use a case on sysname in cpurc and compare updates on sources as they rarely occur.
i find it's easier to have everything in one file not scattered across
several. (the largest cpurc i've used had 13 cases with 5 architectures.)
default case * gives a `normal' general-purpose cpu server.