From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 09:59:27 -0400
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <946f6eb3ec93afa081032aed6b28b68f@plug.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <621112A569DAE948AD25CCDCF1C075332999FA@dolly.ntdom.cupdx>
References: <621112A569DAE948AD25CCDCF1C075332999F1@dolly.ntdom.cupdx>
	<AANLkTikOG14RFavHF_GOk3d_0rVE5qh=n=Bg3C_C_2TR@mail.gmail.com>
	<a76d4d2bb0de9e139a3ec17ee47a3c60@plug.quanstro.net>
	<621112A569DAE948AD25CCDCF1C075332999FA@dolly.ntdom.cupdx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] permissions
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 67eb9876-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> >to elaborate: group permission is not implemented by any
> >kernel file servers in the standard distribution.
>
> And yet, it honors "others" permissions?  I can set the r
> bit on others, and the cat then works...

many fileservers assume that a user is always a member
of a group of the same name.  i wouldn't call that implementing
groups.

- erik