From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <955c674d73ea16246b232065c9c6dd77@quintile.net>
From: "Steve Simon" <steve@quintile.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 14:56:52 +0100
To: 9fans@9fans.net
In-Reply-To: <8a74e4235d48b56ef9fd8eee42c95c74@brasstown.quanstro.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] duppage
Topicbox-Message-UUID: f95eab8e-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> if a process exits and is then run again, it will always be re-read
> from storage.  (since channel comparisons factor in to finding
> an image.)  only if the lifetime overlaps will the cached image be
> used.

The one place where  I can imagine lots of cache hits is when running
parallel mk jobs, it would be interesting to measure and see how much
of a win it is.

idle Tuesday thoughts.

-Steve