From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <960655d29e75c3d7fe277741ecb03cc1@plan9.escet.urjc.es> To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu From: Fco.J.Ballesteros MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [9fans] fs auth commands Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 10:51:46 +0200 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 9efe7312-eaca-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 > W.r.t. the idefs console commands, it occured to me that we > now have (or already had?) different ways to enable/disable > things: > - separate commands (allow/disallow, like allow in config mode, > and in disk/kfscmd), and > - flag subcommands (flag authdisable) > where with the latter the status (enabled/disabled) > can be observed with 'flag'. Just an observation. Yes, and I don't like that. Allow/disallow are like the config mode allow + reboot. We could perhaps replace the config mode allow with these other commands, but I'd suggest we do so only if the distributed file server does the same (I think we don't want two different systems). Regarding the auth flag, there's a comment that says that it's for development (in fact the flag was commented out); thus I'd say we can forget about it.