From: Michael Jeffrey <michael@vitanuova.com>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: [9fans] Re: Plan 9 or Inferno, which ot choose?
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 09:23:56 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <969826093.22895.0.nnrp-14.9e98cd5e@news.demon.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <969693940.635831@news>
They are similar in that they both virtualise resources in the
network through the aggressive, application of a simple,
unifying protocol. This is contrast to the approach adopted
by other technologies (for example Java/Jini) which are
linguistic by nature. A linguistic approach to distribution requires
the implementation of a program (execution environment for the
language) around the network - such programs are typically large.
In general, an approach based on distribution of protocol not
program is likely to be more profitable.
Inferno takes the ideas of Plan 9 further still and
virtualises the entire OS. As a consequence it can run
native on bare hardware and also hosted on top of an
existing OS (Windows, Linux, Solaris, ...).
Which to choose though? Plan 9 is a C environment for application
development, Inferno is Limbo - so that may sway you one way
or the other. Inferno does not necessarily require the replacement
of an existing OS, which may also influence the decision. Perhaps
use both.
A full description of Inferno can be found at www.vitanuova.com and
also details of how to obtain the source code.
Alexander L <alex-sci@freenet.co.nz> wrote in message
news:969693940.635831@news...
> Hi again :-)
>
> Another questions, when do we need plan 9 and Inferno? They seem like the
> same thing but I feel there's a difference between them. Are there any web
> sites
> from bell labs which related to inferno?
>
>
> --
> Art is not the same thing you do with science.
> However, scientific researching connects engineering, design and art
> altogether.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-09-25 9:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-09-23 8:17 [9fans] " Alexander L
2000-09-23 8:56 ` [9fans] " Douglas A. Gwyn
2000-09-25 9:23 ` Michael Jeffrey [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=969826093.22895.0.nnrp-14.9e98cd5e@news.demon.co.uk \
--to=michael@vitanuova.com \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).