From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <9754e46bd89fc67ac49939b849c4e414@plan9.bell-labs.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 15:52:15 -0500
From: jmk@plan9.bell-labs.com
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] 386
In-Reply-To: <9ab217670510301234p506ae1e3j@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Topicbox-Message-UUID: a2a3ac20-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Sun Oct 30 15:34:52 EST 2005, devon.odell@gmail.com wrote:
> ...
> My understanding of how this got into the embedded chipset stuff was
> that a suggestion was made to deprecate 486 as well, which I don't
> think we should do at all. Get rid of 386, support 486+.
> ...

If you keep the 486 then there is no point in removing the 386,
you would gain nothing.