From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <975b41bfa536fb4479782a20122a057c@caldo.demon.co.uk>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: Drawterm and Inferno? Was: [9fans] fortune-worthy
From: Charles Forsyth <forsyth@caldo.demon.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20031219090231.086ab039.martin@parvat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 08:18:00 +0000
Topicbox-Message-UUID: ab846518-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

>>it not be relatively easy (or at least, easier than it was) to rewrite
>>drawterm in limbo?

i'd have thought it would be close to a shell script,
given some commands that roger has done to interact
with rio, that might (or might not) even be in the current distribution.

much of drawterm is similar to a large subset of emu
(and supporting libraries).