From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <976604dd42baa1aa2000207474bb8aef@granite.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] last update got strange acme behaviour
From: okamoto@granite.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
	boundary="upas-nzoghqqwqabonnzpjykzxxujlf"
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 16:42:38 +0900
Topicbox-Message-UUID: d43d8004-eaca-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--upas-nzoghqqwqabonnzpjykzxxujlf
Content-Disposition: inline
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I searched once more the reason of this.  There is a two version of
acme win program, one works fine, and the other does not.

The first is that one before I fetched many patches and recompiled;

ls -l /n/dump/2002/0723/acme/bin/386/win
	--rwxrwxr-x M 9 sys sys 174975 Apr 2 01:42 /n/dump/2002/0723/acme/bin/386/win

and the second is that after I recomplied:

ls -l /acme/bin/386/win
	--rwxrwxr-x M 9 sys sys 175343 Jul 24 16:48 /acme/bin/386/win

As there is no difference between these sources, I suppose this reflect the
difference between the lower libraries, probably libc (?).

Kenji

--upas-nzoghqqwqabonnzpjykzxxujlf
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Disposition: inline

Received: from granite.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp ([192.168.1.3]) by diabase; Thu Jul 25 10:49:35 JST 2002
Received: from elmo.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp (elmo.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp [157.16.103.2])
	by granite.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA03652
	for <okamoto@granite.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp>; Thu, 25 Jul 2002 10:35:41 +0900
Received: from mail.cse.psu.edu (psuvax1.cse.psu.edu [130.203.4.6])
	by elmo.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp (8.9.3/3.7W-02040219) with ESMTP id KAA05371
	for <okamoto@granite.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp>; Thu, 25 Jul 2002 10:49:23 +0900 (JST)
Received: from psuvax1.cse.psu.edu (psuvax1.cse.psu.edu [130.203.18.6])
	by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with ESMTP
	id DA233199B9; Wed, 24 Jul 2002 21:49:13 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Received: from granite.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp (granite.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp [157.16.101.69])
	by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with SMTP id 170B619991
	for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Wed, 24 Jul 2002 21:48:31 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <9ddb596b212ad3a7fea4d865385f5429@granite.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
From: okamoto@granite.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [9fans] last update got strange acme behaviour
Sender: 9fans-admin@cse.psu.edu
Errors-To: 9fans-admin@cse.psu.edu
X-BeenThere: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
List-Id: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans.cse.psu.edu>
List-Archive: <https://lists.cse.psu.edu/archives/9fans/>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 10:47:55 +0900

I got last update (July 24) from plan9 sources using replica/pull.
I recompiled all the things by the new source trees after that pull.

Now I have a strange behaviour of win command in acme.

In an acme window, 
'win rc' command runs smoothly, and makes another acme window
with the prompt of
term%

Then, I dispatched the command ls at the window, and got error as
rc: note: '0x0e'

'0x0e' means so control code.

I'd be glad if someone could give me where I should search the problem.

Kenji

--upas-nzoghqqwqabonnzpjykzxxujlf--