From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu From: Chris Locke Message-ID: <978437891.4167.0.nnrp-14.d4f0e306@news.demon.co.uk> References: <200012231321.NAA02607@whitecrow.demon.co.uk>, <005c01c06d47$d182f4e0$35d76ccb@coma> Subject: Re: [9fans] Re: Future of Plan9 Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2001 17:52:05 +0000 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 4166a360-eac9-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 Boyd wrote... > i tried to add in proxy-auth -- eject, eject, eject! Shouldn't that be "reject, reject, reject"? more seriously - got an RFC for proxy-auth? Save me the time of digging around for it and I may have some spare time to put it in Charon. BTW. What in particular did you not like about the Charon code? There is certainly some grot still in there - the worst stuff is the lame attempt at I18n introduced by Lucent (not the labs). I completely stripped this out in an (unpublished) I18n version that I need to do some more work on The original code from the labs is excellent - well structured and very readable. Especially given the complete crock-of-poo standards it is trying to adhere to. I wont comment on my own contributions.