From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Thu,  2 Jan 2014 20:16:03 -0500
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <97889253d25932d6abd2f05519538016@brasstown.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <42f7b3a718669c312857474928264738@felloff.net>
References: <42f7b3a718669c312857474928264738@felloff.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] devproc noteid changing for none
Topicbox-Message-UUID: abcebd3c-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Thu Jan  2 19:33:37 EST 2014, cinap_lenrek@felloff.net wrote:
> ah, yes.

i ran some tests on this version, and it seems to work fine across
tick timer wraparound.  this was done by artificially setting sys->ticks negative
on boot.  also, there was some cheezy added code to the timer check loop
to make sure that all the timers were in order (mod zeros).

that being said, let's hope this really is the last of the gremlins
in alarm.

- erik