From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Anthony Sorace Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257) Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_661E746E-2F3E-483C-BFD2-A86F1E069C7A"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 16:38:35 -0400 In-Reply-To: To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> References: <011b9189eff1a19b0e074faf782dd598@coraid.com> <10d878ecf07027f04938fb4353c8b080@brasstown.quanstro.net> Message-Id: <97DD3287-6CCF-45F0-A2EE-30CBBF61D509@9srv.net> Subject: Re: [9fans] Regarding 9p based "protocols" message framing Topicbox-Message-UUID: 6d9eaf5a-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 --Apple-Mail=_661E746E-2F3E-483C-BFD2-A86F1E069C7A Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Mar 21, 2012, at 16:27 , erik quanstrom wrote: > (in fact, i'd go further than il. why do we need the ip in il?) I'd love to have an IP-free, 9p-capable network in the mix. Plan 9 had this, way back when, with "nonet" (?), but that didn't survive the removal of the streams system in the 3rd edition (I know you know this already,but I'm not sure how widely it's known). Anthony --Apple-Mail=_661E746E-2F3E-483C-BFD2-A86F1E069C7A Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAk9qPEsACgkQyrb52b5lrs5LzgCdHB6IUJaZxusigqErIe9rHtt4 e+UAnisdMk3mtbQTXieJRMKCT/DeVfCa =CMou -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_661E746E-2F3E-483C-BFD2-A86F1E069C7A--