* [9fans] etherrhine vs ethervt6102
@ 2005-11-13 17:50 "Nils O. Selåsdal"
2005-11-13 18:54 ` jmk
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: "Nils O. Selåsdal" @ 2005-11-13 17:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
Seems some people, me included, have (had) problems with the
etherrhine driver.
Should the pc* kernel configs be updated to
include the vt6102 driver instead ?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] etherrhine vs ethervt6102
2005-11-13 17:50 [9fans] etherrhine vs ethervt6102 "Nils O. Selåsdal"
@ 2005-11-13 18:54 ` jmk
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: jmk @ 2005-11-13 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
Thanks. We talked about that recently and I have attempted
to make the change.
--jim
On Sun Nov 13 12:52:03 EST 2005, noselasd@asgaard.homelinux.org wrote:
> Seems some people, me included, have (had) problems with the
> etherrhine driver.
> Should the pc* kernel configs be updated to
> include the vt6102 driver instead ?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-11-13 18:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-11-13 17:50 [9fans] etherrhine vs ethervt6102 "Nils O. Selåsdal"
2005-11-13 18:54 ` jmk
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).