From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Subject: Re: [9fans] assembly syntax in plan 9
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:27:42 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <97e2d17d77f56906982f8a3ae34c486c@chula.quanstro.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F144B53.6070906@gmail.com>
> [Or we could just skip C99, and make the compiler C11-compliant by
> pre-defining __STDC_NO_VLA__. ☺]
i think the the compilers have taken c99 under advisement. see
/sys/src/cmd/cc/c99. most reasonable features of c99 have
been implemented.
of the remaining entries in the "Not Done (yet?)" section, 9, 19 and
and 25 stand out to me as the most worth implementing. (although proper
implementation of 25 is likely to break some things.) other folks might
be more excited about _Imaginary, _Complex and
_Surelythisisobscureenoughtonotbreakstuff.
but otoh, we seem to have bigger fish to fry.
- erik
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-16 16:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-16 12:30 Alexander Kapshuk
2012-01-16 13:08 ` Charles Forsyth
2012-01-16 13:27 ` Alexander Kapshuk
2012-01-16 15:41 ` Bakul Shah
2012-01-16 18:51 ` Comeau At9Fans
2012-01-16 19:03 ` Bakul Shah
2012-01-16 19:39 ` Charles Forsyth
2012-01-17 19:27 ` Comeau At9Fans
[not found] ` <CAOw7k5iYxoVUHYYxf1Dg9ESWwTon_aGFxhNkuyUGbkXwiKO9DA@mail.gmail.c>
2012-01-16 19:49 ` erik quanstrom
2012-01-17 19:29 ` Comeau At9Fans
2012-01-16 20:11 ` Joel C. Salomon
2012-01-16 23:18 ` Bakul Shah
2012-01-17 19:31 ` Comeau At9Fans
2012-01-17 19:21 ` Comeau At9Fans
2012-01-18 17:48 ` Bakul Shah
2012-01-18 18:32 ` Comeau At9Fans
2012-01-16 16:07 ` Joel C. Salomon
2012-01-16 16:27 ` erik quanstrom [this message]
2012-01-16 16:40 ` Charles Forsyth
2012-01-16 16:54 ` Bakul Shah
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=97e2d17d77f56906982f8a3ae34c486c@chula.quanstro.net \
--to=quanstro@quanstro.net \
--cc=9fans@9fans.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).