From: <aam396@mail.usask.ca>
To: <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Performance
Date: Tue, 8 May 2001 12:07:45 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <989345265.3af835f11c710@my.usask.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.20010508104215.01407b50@mail.real.com>
i have gathered a bit more data since i posted my PovRay comparison between plan9 and linux (also available from
http://homepage.usask.ca/aam396/P9BL.html)... not exact numbers, but the breakdown is pretty much like:
network -- linux much faster
io -- linux somewhat faster, much faster when io involves screen/graphics
raw cpu instruction execution -- linux and p9 are comparable, with linux being slightly ahead...
now, the following i am reluctant to post, since i don't think it is very good (at least for the eyes of most of the
people reading this list), but nonetheless, here is one of my milestones for the project discussed above:
http://homepage.usask.ca/~aam396/milestone.txt
this one is not really p9 vs Linux, but i hope it's useful
andrey
Quoting Fariborz 'Skip' Tavakkolian <fst@real.com>:
> Are there any published performance numbers more recent than those
> mentioned in 9 and net papers? Any for typical PC platforms compared
> to Linux or FreeBSD?
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-05-08 18:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-05-08 17:42 Fariborz 'Skip' Tavakkolian
2001-05-08 18:07 ` aam396 [this message]
2001-05-08 22:38 ` Boyd Roberts
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-05-11 13:52 jmk
2001-05-10 17:21 jmk
2001-05-11 8:33 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2001-05-09 14:47 Richard Miller
2001-05-10 15:14 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2001-05-09 13:03 presotto
2001-05-09 12:57 jmk
2001-05-09 8:58 forsyth
2001-05-09 6:03 nemo
2001-05-08 21:33 Russ Cox
2001-05-09 2:09 ` Ronald G Minnich
2001-05-10 15:15 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2001-05-08 21:25 jmk
2001-05-08 18:20 jmk
2001-05-09 8:29 ` Peter Schay
2001-05-08 17:54 nemo
2001-05-08 18:46 ` Scott Schwartz
2001-05-08 17:40 presotto
2001-05-08 18:45 ` Scott Schwartz
2001-05-09 5:35 ` Franklin Robert Araujo Fran€a
2001-05-10 8:43 ` Juhani Forsman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=989345265.3af835f11c710@my.usask.ca \
--to=aam396@mail.usask.ca \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).