From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <98a77d6eebf130f7317d30369f139a21@coraid.com>
Subject: Re: [9fans] plan9 function names
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@coraid.com>
Date: Thu,  8 Mar 2007 07:22:09 -0500
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 1b4aea0c-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Thu Mar  8 04:48:10 EST 2007, DAGwyn@null.net wrote:
> > is there a reason why underscores are avoided in most function and
> > variable names on Plan 9? ...
> 
> As with any matter of programming style, it's what the people
> chose to do because they thought it worked better for them.
> SomePeoplePreferThisStyle to a_style_using_underscores.

but plan 9 prefers style.

- erik