From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <99c511594f4894ba7d456adfac2c3862@vitanuova.com>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] ramfs, lib9p
From: rog@vitanuova.com
In-Reply-To: <408e8452$1@pfaff2.ethz.ch>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 17:32:53 +0100
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 701c45ee-eacd-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

> /sys/src/lib9p/ramfs.c  seems newer, because does use lib9p

newer, but not much used.

i'd not be surprised if the newer version was written just to test
lib9p and wasn't as fully featured as /sys/src/cmd/ramfs.c (for
instance, the lib9p version doesn't deal with exclusive-use files, as
far as i can see).

what are the "bad bugs" in the older one?