* Re: [9fans] remote access to audio devices [not found] <<F7BCB408-74FB-4E3C-BBAF-C52E0C2A15B3@fastmail.fm> @ 2009-12-25 9:57 ` erik quanstrom 2009-12-25 14:49 ` Jorden Mauro 2009-12-26 3:39 ` Anthony Sorace 0 siblings, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: erik quanstrom @ 2009-12-25 9:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 9fans > Java sometimes does turn up trumps where C code struggles on machines > which were recently considered powerful. Other examples would be web what? - erik ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] remote access to audio devices 2009-12-25 9:57 ` [9fans] remote access to audio devices erik quanstrom @ 2009-12-25 14:49 ` Jorden Mauro 2010-01-05 12:10 ` Enrico Weigelt 2009-12-26 3:39 ` Anthony Sorace 1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Jorden Mauro @ 2009-12-25 14:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs; +Cc: 9fans On Dec 25, 2009, at 4:57 AM, erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net> wrote: >> Java sometimes does turn up trumps where C code struggles on machines >> which were recently considered powerful. Other examples would be web > > what? > Could be talking about GC? I saw a paper once that described speedups in X11 when hooked up to the Boehm collector. I'm always sceptical about these kinds of claims. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] remote access to audio devices 2009-12-25 14:49 ` Jorden Mauro @ 2010-01-05 12:10 ` Enrico Weigelt 0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Enrico Weigelt @ 2010-01-05 12:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs * Jorden Mauro <jrm8005@gmail.com> wrote: > I saw a paper once that described speedups > in X11 when hooked up to the Boehm collector. hmm, do you know how did it and if there's any code on that yet ? cu -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Enrico Weigelt, metux IT service -- http://www.metux.de/ phone: +49 36207 519931 email: weigelt@metux.de mobile: +49 174 7066481 icq: 210169427 skype: nekrad666 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Embedded-Linux / Portierung / Opensource-QM / Verteilte Systeme ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] remote access to audio devices 2009-12-25 9:57 ` [9fans] remote access to audio devices erik quanstrom 2009-12-25 14:49 ` Jorden Mauro @ 2009-12-26 3:39 ` Anthony Sorace 2009-12-27 10:07 ` Ethan Grammatikidis 1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Anthony Sorace @ 2009-12-26 3:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs On Dec 25, 2009, at 04:57, erik quanstrom wrote: >> Java sometimes does turn up trumps where C code struggles on machines >> which were recently considered powerful. Other examples would be web > > what? from the rest of his post, i gather that the claim isn't that Java vs. C code of equivalent quality has C lagging, but rather that some application written in Java can beat an application of vaguely equivalent description written in C. the VNC examples given say, basically, that the Java app performs better out of the box than the C app, but it seems to just be about picking better (for that particular case) defaults. i guess my question is really what this observation is intended to illustrate. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] remote access to audio devices 2009-12-26 3:39 ` Anthony Sorace @ 2009-12-27 10:07 ` Ethan Grammatikidis 0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Ethan Grammatikidis @ 2009-12-27 10:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs On 26 Dec 2009, at 3:39 am, Anthony Sorace wrote: > On Dec 25, 2009, at 04:57, erik quanstrom wrote: > >>> Java sometimes does turn up trumps where C code struggles on >>> machines >>> which were recently considered powerful. Other examples would be web >> >> what? > > from the rest of his post, i gather that the claim isn't that Java > vs. C code of equivalent > quality has C lagging, but rather that some application written in > Java can beat an > application of vaguely equivalent description written in C. the VNC > examples given > say, basically, that the Java app performs better out of the box > than the C app, but it > seems to just be about picking better (for that particular case) > defaults. > > i guess my question is really what this observation is intended to > illustrate. > > Yes, that would be what I meant. Thanks for writing that Anthony, these things are all pretty clear in my head, but writing them out clearly is quite hard work. -- Ethan Grammatikidis eekee57@fastmail.fm ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] Scanners
@ 2009-11-26 0:07 Charles Forsyth
2009-11-26 4:55 ` W B Hacker
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Charles Forsyth @ 2009-11-26 0:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
>If Plan9 can 'plumb' a remote sound card, (a questionable example long
>publicized) I'm sure it can do so with a mouse.
it isn't plumbing, but export/import, and it's useful.
i had a usable sound system on my r3000 indigo, but my PC had none.
on the pc, i imported the indigo's /dev and played sounds that way.
i could imagine uses even a continent away (alarm system imports remote
/dev and announces trouble). next door might be more useful.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] Scanners 2009-11-26 0:07 [9fans] Scanners Charles Forsyth @ 2009-11-26 4:55 ` W B Hacker 2009-11-26 6:39 ` [9fans] remote access to audio devices Sam Watkins 0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: W B Hacker @ 2009-11-26 4:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs Charles Forsyth wrote: >> If Plan9 can 'plumb' a remote sound card, (a questionable example long >> publicized) I'm sure it can do so with a mouse. > > it isn't plumbing, but export/import, and it's useful. > i had a usable sound system on my r3000 indigo, but my PC had none. > on the pc, i imported the indigo's /dev and played sounds that way. > i could imagine uses even a continent away (alarm system imports remote > /dev and announces trouble). next door might be more useful. > > Welll - in the same room, it would seem 'sneakernet' would do well enough. Point of fact, I use three kdb,vid,mouse and ... a swivel chair... less confusing than sharing/switching among three disparate OS'en. ;-) And I've actually considered remote audio I/O as part of a system for monitoring a house that sits empty for months at a time, and responding to the doorbell .. intrusion, et al ... but.. 'edge cases', both, if ever were. Easy enough to do without Plan9. 'Too easy' to be fair. 'export/import' applied to remote resources - especially 'scarce' or expensive ones (sound cards no longer are..) that could *send back* the results might make a better present-day example. If we could identify a few... Couple of thoughts: - hardware crypto devices (cheap and cheerful in recent VIA CPU, seldom seen otherwise) - fast, specialty (expensive) graphics processing engines for storage to file, or streaming-back not (necessarily) remote display. Ray tracing comes to mind... - a 'ration' - free or purchased - of grid or supercomputing resources? (several experts here - I'm not among them) In any case, given that audio codecs are near-as-dammit ubiquitous on commodity, and even 'server grade' and 'embedded' system boards these many years, I think a better example than sharing a Soundblaster-equivalent is overdue. I'm well aware that 'marketing' Plan9 is not really on anyone's radar here .. but there could be a bit more done to convey the availability and value to the like-minded potential fellow-travelers [1]. One benefit might include more current device driver import/devel.. JM2CW Bill [1] FWIW - the 'Blue Gene' Plan9 work deserves better publicity. If/as/when one hears that a certain 'hobby' alleged-OS is being run on such expensive kit, one tends to question why it was even built... ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [9fans] remote access to audio devices 2009-11-26 4:55 ` W B Hacker @ 2009-11-26 6:39 ` Sam Watkins 2009-11-26 8:59 ` W B Hacker 0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Sam Watkins @ 2009-11-26 6:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs VNC or similar "remote desktop" with sound support can be useful for things like pair-programming over then internet, if you are working on an app or game that uses sound. Sam ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] remote access to audio devices 2009-11-26 6:39 ` [9fans] remote access to audio devices Sam Watkins @ 2009-11-26 8:59 ` W B Hacker 2009-12-01 20:44 ` Steve Simon 0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: W B Hacker @ 2009-11-26 8:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs Sam Watkins wrote: > VNC or similar "remote desktop" with sound support can be useful for things > like pair-programming over then internet, if you are working on an app or game > that uses sound. > > Sam > > VNC can (has been) be a butt-saver' - but pales in comparison to remote desktop / remote X for relative responsiveness and seamlessness. (And we are speaking cross-platform, as Plan9 <=> Plan9 doesn't necessarily need either..) Bill ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] remote access to audio devices 2009-11-26 8:59 ` W B Hacker @ 2009-12-01 20:44 ` Steve Simon 2009-12-01 22:28 ` Ethan Grammatikidis 0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Steve Simon @ 2009-12-01 20:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 9fans > VNC can (has been) be a butt-saver' - but pales in comparison to remote desktop > / remote X for relative responsiveness and seamlessness. My experience of serving a Windows desktop to a plan9 terminal is that TightVNC with the DFMirage "Mirror driver" works really well. -Steve ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] remote access to audio devices 2009-12-01 20:44 ` Steve Simon @ 2009-12-01 22:28 ` Ethan Grammatikidis 2009-12-02 0:26 ` Patrick Kelly 0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Ethan Grammatikidis @ 2009-12-01 22:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs On 1 Dec 2009, at 8:44 pm, Steve Simon wrote: >> VNC can (has been) be a butt-saver' - but pales in comparison to >> remote desktop >> / remote X for relative responsiveness and seamlessness. > > My experience of serving a Windows desktop to a plan9 terminal > is that TightVNC with the DFMirage "Mirror driver" works really well. I've had responsiveness issues when the viewing machine hasn't enough CPU power to decode the screen data in real-time. A lot of power seems to be needed, my PDA, a 416MHz ARM can't cope with any compression at all, I have to limit vncviewer to copyrect and raw encodings only. Encoding doesn't seem to need half as much CPU power. I ran Xvnc on a headless server with a 400MHz AMD K6 with no issues that I recall. All that gear was using either TightVNC or the plain vnc-x.y.z.tar.gz from RealVNC. When using Vine Server on a 466MHz Apple screen updates are not really adequate, while the mouse pointer lags if I use the VNC server supplied with OS X Tiger on the same machine. x0vncserver is a known problem server which I haven't used, IIRC it basically works by taking screenshots continuously and sending those. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] remote access to audio devices 2009-12-01 22:28 ` Ethan Grammatikidis @ 2009-12-02 0:26 ` Patrick Kelly 2009-12-02 3:00 ` Sam Watkins 0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Patrick Kelly @ 2009-12-02 0:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs On Dec 1, 2009, at 17:28, Ethan Grammatikidis <eekee57@fastmail.fm> wrote: > > On 1 Dec 2009, at 8:44 pm, Steve Simon wrote: > >>> VNC can (has been) be a butt-saver' - but pales in comparison to >>> remote desktop >>> / remote X for relative responsiveness and seamlessness. >> >> My experience of serving a Windows desktop to a plan9 terminal >> is that TightVNC with the DFMirage "Mirror driver" works really well. > > I've had responsiveness issues when the viewing machine hasn't > enough CPU power to decode the screen data in real-time. A lot of > power seems to be needed, my PDA, a 416MHz ARM can't cope with any > compression at all, I have to limit vncviewer to copyrect and raw > encodings only. Encoding doesn't seem to need half as much CPU > power. I ran Xvnc on a headless server with a 400MHz AMD K6 with no > issues that I recall. Now I don't have any expertise with VNC, but decoding anything, is supposed to take less time than encoding it. I would check into that. > > All that gear was using either TightVNC or the plain vnc- > x.y.z.tar.gz from RealVNC. When using Vine Server on a 466MHz Apple > screen updates are not really adequate, while the mouse pointer > lags if I use the VNC server supplied with OS X Tiger on the same > machine. x0vncserver is a known problem server which I haven't used, > IIRC it basically works by taking screenshots continuously and > sending those. > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] remote access to audio devices 2009-12-02 0:26 ` Patrick Kelly @ 2009-12-02 3:00 ` Sam Watkins 2009-12-25 9:50 ` Ethan Grammatikidis 0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Sam Watkins @ 2009-12-02 3:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs Ethan Grammatikidis wrote: >I've had responsiveness issues when the viewing machine hasn't enough CPU >power to decode the screen data in real-time. A lot of power seems to be >needed, my PDA, a 416MHz ARM can't cope with any compression at all, I have >to limit vncviewer to copyrect and raw encodings only. The Java tightvnc client works fine on my little eee pc, so I would think the native client should run well enough on a toaster. Maybe it uses floating point and the ARM pda in question doesn't have hardware floating point. Sam ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] remote access to audio devices 2009-12-02 3:00 ` Sam Watkins @ 2009-12-25 9:50 ` Ethan Grammatikidis 0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Ethan Grammatikidis @ 2009-12-25 9:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs On 2 Dec 2009, at 3:00 am, Sam Watkins wrote: > Ethan Grammatikidis wrote: >> I've had responsiveness issues when the viewing machine hasn't >> enough CPU >> power to decode the screen data in real-time. A lot of power >> seems to be >> needed, my PDA, a 416MHz ARM can't cope with any compression at >> all, I have >> to limit vncviewer to copyrect and raw encodings only. > > The Java tightvnc client works fine on my little eee pc, so I would > think the > native client should run well enough on a toaster. Maybe it uses > floating > point and the ARM pda in question doesn't have hardware floating > point. > > Sam > Java sometimes does turn up trumps where C code struggles on machines which were recently considered powerful. Other examples would be web browsing and Flash video. Now the web supports alternative style sheets to present a simpler layout on mobile devices and Flash supports a supports a video format which takes less work to decode - YouTube offers it as an option. Perhaps the Java TightVNC client declines the trickier encodings, exactly as I have to pass options to the C client to do. By default the C TightVNC and RealVNC clients assume "we can has cycles," which leaves me wondering quite what situations have sufficient computing power with such measly bandwidth as to make the 'heavy' encodings worthwhile. Sorry for the late reply, had to ignore email to get other things in order. -- freedesktop.org, because unix doesn't make things harder enough. Ethan Grammatikidis eekee57@fastmail.fm ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-01-05 12:10 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- [not found] <<F7BCB408-74FB-4E3C-BBAF-C52E0C2A15B3@fastmail.fm> 2009-12-25 9:57 ` [9fans] remote access to audio devices erik quanstrom 2009-12-25 14:49 ` Jorden Mauro 2010-01-05 12:10 ` Enrico Weigelt 2009-12-26 3:39 ` Anthony Sorace 2009-12-27 10:07 ` Ethan Grammatikidis 2009-11-26 0:07 [9fans] Scanners Charles Forsyth 2009-11-26 4:55 ` W B Hacker 2009-11-26 6:39 ` [9fans] remote access to audio devices Sam Watkins 2009-11-26 8:59 ` W B Hacker 2009-12-01 20:44 ` Steve Simon 2009-12-01 22:28 ` Ethan Grammatikidis 2009-12-02 0:26 ` Patrick Kelly 2009-12-02 3:00 ` Sam Watkins 2009-12-25 9:50 ` Ethan Grammatikidis
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).