From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <9CF7937042B138BD017824241CCF9B30@ewsd.inri.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 23:40:11 -0500
From: sl@9front.org
To: mayuresh@kathe.in, 9fans@9fans.net, sl@9front.org
In-Reply-To: b695424f28532ca7d5565b80553a67ec@kathe.in
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] upas : without acme : possible?
Topicbox-Message-UUID: efeb20b8-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

It's not clear why you think the interface provided by upasfs(4) is captive, or why you insist acme needs to be involved at all. I'm writing this message with nedmail/marshal, connected to Plan 9 in a plain SSH terminal session -> OpenBSD -> drawterm -G. No GUI or terminal frills or frippery is involved.

sl