From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
To: <9fans@9fans.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=UTF-8;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 03:07:04 -0600
From: EBo <ebo@sandien.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinT7OKJyhCVh8_5Y0J+d9wtBE8w4yKS1RLa=axQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <eba624e58560ae3fa25ed54905eb7727@ladd.quanstro.net>
	<75ea74312ad96f76de8cd4b3291ffb1d@brasstown.quanstro.net>
	<AANLkTik0LMeWaT5wo2RRWcrzqRz+RX2a_o45UjcFSMgs@mail.gmail.com>
	<d8838076af10656ad31056e8704f034b@chula.quanstro.net>
	<1e4bfd86eef85bbf4434f8ef22b6fed7@plug.quanstro.net>
	<AANLkTi=6P_m+XM7REhYYiLuRft_UccjVj+SoNH8cZNAR@mail.gmail.com>
	<948e9cbd967366d058ac8a033ce93f5f@plug.quanstro.net>
	<AANLkTi=RGkzqgWmwSjxsa3ok4dB+9LTFWJp+DOzz7o=E@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTikvbZ0puqG=T01ZB6hSGKPmmzBFByU43oFn43A3@mail.gmail.com>
	<53acf6ebfa4f01bbe09d6ed494ef68b1@plug.quanstro.net>
	<AANLkTi=Ay3MzQ4TZO1uJdnD24Tqv-PbOuMzt4fjb+r8Y@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinT7OKJyhCVh8_5Y0J+d9wtBE8w4yKS1RLa=axQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <9a9e0cc30cdb51a02aa6a8ddc78432b8@swcp.com>
User-Agent: RoundCube Webmail/0.4-trunk
Subject: Re: [9fans] p9p factotum available for plan 9
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 7ac23112-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> Does anyone use 9P2000.u anymore?
> Can we just remove it from the p9p tree?

 Last summer when I was banging my head against the bug in alloctree I
 got it all to work when I removed 9P2000.u and some other stuff from
 lib9p/srv.c.  At that time I got a comment back that the patches I
 proposed would likely not be accepted, in part because I removed the
 9P2000.u code...

 If there are no objections to removing 9P2000.u, I can tell you that
 migrating p9p's srv.c code back to Plan 9's version does in fact fix the
 bugs in Tree.  I was simply not sure how many of the changes had to be
 reverted to make alloctree work properly.


   EBo --