From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 23:33:13 -0400
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <9aabc5f61add44ecbbab4078b75c007d@brasstown.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <CANZw+5fxCXQqzDdmu3hdQH1x+yREj8jxg4txgTL0Nty_pKSeQw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CANZw+5erSHssFLekpwpJiyMJsFfcoXuxQzBeHvmefUHF36tYDw@mail.gmail.com>
	<1AA24696-BAFC-42BF-9C6E-F4F19985D88B@9srv.net>
	<CANZw+5fxCXQqzDdmu3hdQH1x+yREj8jxg4txgTL0Nty_pKSeQw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] 9GridChan
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 7510cac4-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> Of another question, do many members of the list run Plan 9 on VIA
> systems?  We all know their support for Linux can be a bit woeful, but
> they say (in the specs) the newer USB3.0 systems have specific Linux
> support.  I suppose the question should more be "Do many members use
> QEMU on VIA systems for Plan 9?" And perhaps this isn't exactly the
> place...  for the list to decide.

until recently, we ran plan 9 on native via.  they were ok terminals.
but for $99 in 2008, not bad at all.

- erik