From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <9ab217670603021523q6d9c74ex@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu,  2 Mar 2006 15:23:13 -0800
From: "Devon H. O'Dell" <devon.odell@gmail.com>
To: matthiasb@acm.org,
	"Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] amd64 support in p9p?
In-Reply-To: <20060302231511.GA11050@pestilenz.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <20060302231511.GA11050@pestilenz.org>
Cc:
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 0a6c2d64-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

I have some / all of it working on FreeBSD/amd64. I'll try to get a
set of patches created soon. I don't know how well this would work
with OpenBSD.

--Devon

2006/3/2, plan9@weggla.franken.de <plan9@weggla.franken.de>:
> Hi all,
> is there anybody interested in helping to port the
> plan9 from user space to amd64/x86_64?
> The most platform dependend code seems to be the libthread
> stuff. On OpenBSD-amd64 I can borrow an assembler version of
> rfork_thread from the OpenBSD librthread and can improvise
> the _tas function. The get/setmcontext pose a problem because
> I do not know if struct ucontext must really be exactly the same
> as struct sigcontext.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Matthias
>
>
>
> ----- End forwarded message -----
>