From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3e1162e60908130753r6c138522uceee17f049ba288f@mail.gmail.com> References: <7d3530220908110937u5531ebb2x694612602c8d4a3b@mail.gmail.com> <4ecada1e0908130213u4ba7b10p1a2d85d803294e25@mail.gmail.com> <20090813104725.2f1dceaf.eekee57@fastmail.fm> <3e1162e60908130753r6c138522uceee17f049ba288f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 11:13:25 -0400 Message-ID: <9ab217670908130813t3e844c59xed3a9e929ff6bd37@mail.gmail.com> From: "Devon H. O'Dell" To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [9fans] Plan 9 hg with private repositories Topicbox-Message-UUID: 46fe6e0a-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 2009/8/13 David Leimbach : > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 2:47 AM, Ethan Grammatikidis > wrote: >> >> On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 11:13:58 +0200 >> Bela Valek wrote: >> >> > Correct me if I am wrong, but an sshv2 server is also providing sshv1 >> > too. >> >> I vaguely remember reading that some ssh software would refuse to work >> with ssh v1 by default because v1 is so insecure. > > Many times you must turn v1 on, but it's available. =A0It's off by defaul= t due > to it being insecure. If I"m recalling correctly, SSHv1 is insecure only if the remote server is untrusted. Or am I not recalling correctly? --dho >> -- >> Ethan Grammatikidis >> >> Those who are slower at parsing information must >> necessarily be faster at problem-solving. >> > >