From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1fc0d9800911112031n24c47aa6i8722e1c67f110a74@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 10:28:21 -0500 Message-ID: <9ab217670911120728q137ac2c1j4f11d9a1d8b2ded5@mail.gmail.com> From: "Devon H. O'Dell" To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [9fans] Go Topicbox-Message-UUID: 99d5c1be-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 2009/11/12 Roman Shaposhnik : > On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 8:31 PM, Nick LaForge wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 7:20 AM, Roman V Shaposhnik wrote: >> >>> Personally I think you'd be better off exploring a connection that a >>> language called Lua has to C. In the immortal words of Casablanca it >>> just could be "the begging of a beautiful friendship". >> >> Well, it was nice while it lasted. > > Huh? I'll agree with you when Go grows a VM. And even then things like > ... and multi-values (which, of course, are only possible in a dynamically > typed language) will keep me interested. > > Speaking of VMs (and Limbo) -- I'm wondering if Go is eventually going > to have it anyway. Any reason not to? It can be perceived as a competitor to C if it has a runtime, but not if it has a VM. So I don't think it would grow one. --dho > Thanks, > Roman. > >