From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <9adec21573cabfac17f03cf01600b3e5@9netics.com>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: ASN.1 (Was: [9fans] More 'Sam I am')
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 23:04:48 -0800
From: Skip Tavakkolian <9nut@9netics.com>
In-Reply-To: <7ebe705b83452f6e8ab6789c09cb35f2@proxima.alt.za>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Topicbox-Message-UUID: fb9241f2-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

i think any committee that comes up with a proposed standard should
individually be responsible for implementing it.  note that this would
work for large or small efforts.  if the committee is able to
implement it and it works, then it would be adopted.

specific to the question, i like the S-expression approach I've not
used it for anything so my advice is as good as the random committee
member.

> And my question remains: "What is a better option for the conveying of
> platform-independent data than ASN.1 or XML?"