From: lucio@proxima.alt.za
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Subject: Re: [9fans] lguest on 2.6.25
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 20:54:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9c0fd5d9e2824e819ff59e94c3dd7ddd@proxima.alt.za> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080825204841.3806af18@dazone>
> Well, i don't think I am starting two timesync, ps a shows only one:
If Xen is anything to go by, time keeping is a problem in
virtualisation. And Erik is misguiding you :-)
Thing is, if timesync is wresting with the clock as it seems to do if
two instances are running, it does consume a lot of cpu time,
according to experiences reported on this list. But it's possible
that timesync is wrestling with the virtual executive rather than with
another instance of itself.
Would it hurt you to run without timesync?
++L
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-25 18:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-24 23:23 Alex Lee
2008-08-25 4:26 ` ron minnich
2008-08-25 4:32 ` ron minnich
2008-08-25 4:58 ` Alex Lee
2008-08-25 9:03 ` John Soros
2008-08-25 10:56 ` erik quanstrom
2008-08-25 14:52 ` ron minnich
2008-08-25 14:52 ` ron minnich
2008-08-25 14:59 ` erik quanstrom
2008-08-25 15:09 ` ron minnich
2008-08-25 18:48 ` John Soros
2008-08-25 18:54 ` lucio [this message]
2008-08-25 20:39 ` John Soros
2008-08-25 21:27 ` John Soros
2008-08-25 23:53 ` [9fans] Anyone handy with Alpha assembler? Benjamin Huntsman
2008-08-26 15:24 ` Paweł Lasek
2008-08-26 17:56 ` Benjamin Huntsman
2008-08-26 22:03 ` Paweł Lasek
2008-08-26 23:09 ` Benjamin Huntsman
2008-08-25 22:44 ` [9fans] lguest on 2.6.25 ron minnich
2008-08-26 6:44 ` John Soros
2008-08-28 2:28 ` Alex Lee
2008-08-28 2:38 ` ron minnich
2008-08-28 12:06 ` erik quanstrom
2008-08-28 8:21 ` John Soros
2008-08-28 15:38 ` ron minnich
2008-08-28 16:50 ` John Soros
2008-08-28 16:59 ` erik quanstrom
2008-08-28 17:24 ` Alex Lee
2008-08-28 18:07 ` John Soros
2008-08-28 8:27 ` Richard Miller
2008-08-28 11:55 ` erik quanstrom
2008-08-28 17:34 ` Alex Lee
2008-08-28 2:39 ` ron minnich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9c0fd5d9e2824e819ff59e94c3dd7ddd@proxima.alt.za \
--to=lucio@proxima.alt.za \
--cc=9fans@9fans.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).