From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <9c0fd5d9e2824e819ff59e94c3dd7ddd@proxima.alt.za>
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 20:54:53 +0200
From: lucio@proxima.alt.za
In-Reply-To: <20080825204841.3806af18@dazone>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] lguest on 2.6.25
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 078e103c-ead4-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> Well, i don't think I am starting two timesync, ps a shows only one:

If Xen is anything to go by, time keeping is a problem in
virtualisation.  And Erik is misguiding you :-)

Thing is, if timesync is wresting with the clock as it seems to do if
two instances are running, it does consume a lot of cpu time,
according to experiences reported on this list.  But it's possible
that timesync is wrestling with the virtual executive rather than with
another instance of itself.

Would it hurt you to run without timesync?

++L