From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <9c5c5e57c80648ed47d2feaaed27d2d9@collyer.net>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] Secure ftp Again
Date: Sun,  3 Apr 2005 18:05:07 -0700
From: geoff@collyer.net
In-Reply-To: <87cea4f36cf09570b4ed355ec6e95eff@collyer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 323d1804-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

Googling turns up references to the IESG being opposed to `separate
ports' for using TLS and not using TLS under some protocol.  Of course
a new protocol could run only over TLS and thus use some form of
tlsdial().