From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <9e50e05e50455baac05549877537af5d@terzarima.net>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] clunk clunk
From: Charles Forsyth <forsyth@terzarima.net>
Date: Thu,  5 Jan 2006 12:36:08 +0000
In-Reply-To: <775b8d190601050400y4a59f1a9je6dac56d1726e83c@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Topicbox-Message-UUID: d2919014-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

with that change, can't the following fail from time to time:

	chmod +al events
	echo first >>events
	echo second >>events

because the first clunk can be sent after the second open attempt;
similarly for exclusive-use devices.
it could avoid asynchronous clunk where QTEXCL is set, but that doesn't
help exclusive-use devices (although there aren't many of the latter)