From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <9e658d99b4177c2dc1c9483175b5241a@collyer.net>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] rewriting From:
From: Geoff Collyer <geoff@collyer.net>
In-Reply-To: <200304031709.h33H9XGS080683@orthanc.ab.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Thu,  3 Apr 2003 14:08:09 -0800
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 89a3845c-eacb-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

RFCs have forbidden or discouraged use of CNAMEs for more and more
purposes.  I think they are almost useless as a result, if you follow
the letter of the law, though I haven't been able to keep up with the
barrage of RFCs.  Does anybody know in what contexts CNAMEs are still
permitted, if any?