From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <9ea070e906235bad7711085aaa0f21a5@plan9.bell-labs.com>
From: David Presotto <presotto@closedmind.org>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] A quite amusing thing...
In-Reply-To: <000601c2daa7$17972450$270363d9@makr4j0ty5i9an>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2003 15:51:40 -0500
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 6e3b8386-eacb-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

The original form, i.e., timing the aam loop, comes directly from
intel, I forget which manual/developer note, so one could say
the manufacturere is the source.  However, the .5% error and comment
had to come from us.  It was just fudging to get the numbers
close to what microsoft reported to avoid confusing people
and for which I took lots of chastising.