From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <9f2938e55b5a406c40d7726f37c3a10f@plan9.bell-labs.com>
From: David Presotto <presotto@closedmind.org>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] adm vs bootes
In-Reply-To: <81132473206F3A46A72BD6116E1A06AE479CB3@black.aprote.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
	boundary="upas-klybanpacasxdowiaddgverciw"
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 08:36:49 -0500
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 933aefc2-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--upas-klybanpacasxdowiaddgverciw
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On ken's old file server and kfs, the user "adm" was quite
special.  One couldn't authenticate to the file server as
"adm" for example.  In that case, I think it would be a
bad idea.

On fossil, I don't think that there's anything special about
"adm".  Jmk or rsc may correct me.
--upas-klybanpacasxdowiaddgverciw
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Disposition: inline

Received: from plan9.cs.bell-labs.com ([135.104.9.2]) by plan9; Tue Nov 25 08:25:35 EST 2003
Received: from mail.cse.psu.edu ([130.203.4.6]) by plan9; Tue Nov 25 08:25:32 EST 2003
Received: by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server, from userid 60001)
	id 76C4619B66; Tue, 25 Nov 2003 08:25:26 -0500 (EST)
Received: from psuvax1.cse.psu.edu (psuvax1.cse.psu.edu [130.203.18.6])
	by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with ESMTP
	id 10EEE19B9B; Tue, 25 Nov 2003 08:25:12 -0500 (EST)
X-Original-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Delivered-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Received: by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server, from userid 60001)
	id D87FE19B77; Tue, 25 Nov 2003 08:24:11 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ns.aprote.ee (ns.aprote.ee [80.235.78.106])
	by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with ESMTP id 5AE2219B62
	for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Tue, 25 Nov 2003 08:23:59 -0500 (EST)
Received: Message by Barricade ns.aprote.ee  with ESMTP id hAPDNpd8016323
	for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Tue, 25 Nov 2003 15:23:51 +0200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <81132473206F3A46A72BD6116E1A06AE479CB3@black.aprote.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [9fans] Shutdown service
Thread-Index: AcOzVfx8qtUMAntNQTKRSrDcXBHhzQAAUmJQ
From: "Tiit Lankots" <t.lankots@aprote.ee>
To: <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: [9fans] adm vs bootes
Sender: 9fans-admin@cse.psu.edu
Errors-To: 9fans-admin@cse.psu.edu
X-BeenThere: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
List-Id: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans.cse.psu.edu>
List-Archive: <https://lists.cse.psu.edu/archives/9fans/>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 15:23:55 +0200
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0
	tests=none
	version=2.55
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)

Is it a bad idea to make adm the auth server owner?

Tiit
--upas-klybanpacasxdowiaddgverciw--