From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3)
In-Reply-To: <3e1162e60710231527k71c2c1deqe5c5149548fb2640@mail.gmail.com>
References: <13426df10710231210o2ac74db9l77d71813eebf95c6@mail.gmail.com>
	<3e1162e60710231527k71c2c1deqe5c5149548fb2640@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <A85AA674-56E1-48F8-B66B-DC0FDF20F5BE@mac.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Pietro Gagliardi <pietro10@mac.com>
Subject: Re: [9fans] A probably stupid question on portability
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 18:41:03 -0400
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: d7901cfa-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

And C89 too

On Oct 23, 2007, at 6:27 PM, David Leimbach wrote:

>
>
> On 10/23/07, ron minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> wrote: Is this  
> construct portable at this point? c99 or whatever? Or is it gcc- 
> centric?
>
> #if defined(_INCLUDED_GASNET_INTERNAL_H) && !defined 
> (_IN_GASNET_INTERNAL_H)
>
>
>
> ron
>
> It's in the C99 standard.
>