From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=WLeXy0xCR8GPPNkqYCF8dgugE_SkK9jOya-QD@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTinwmuP0RjYz=FsFZQwOCBmj=sUurSJbC70BuDav@mail.gmail.com>
	<40711c3657e4203ed90a91ab770b3380@plug.quanstro.net>
	<AANLkTikEqb08gAGnkHbC0XosnOyqi==vRZVgQ1hpftVx@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110107114021.5d86d2ad@harald.be.alcatel-lucent.com>
	<AANLkTi=WLeXy0xCR8GPPNkqYCF8dgugE_SkK9jOya-QD@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 11:28:23 -0500
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=7WViS_nkFP0yVbAg+E0Mj_EizN7FENoQ4EU3q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [9fans] mk (from plan9ports) modification time resolution issue?
From: Russ Cox <rsc@swtch.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 9ee0542a-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> =C2=A0 =C2=A0But the above statement is true unless you have about 367 ta=
rgets
> (for quite a small project -- only 2 tiny and 1 larger Erlang
> applications), which when built takes about 45 seconds (with
> NPROC=3D16), and the second time (without touching a single file in the
> source directory) takes about exactly the same amount (still 45
> seconds), the third time goes down to 44 seconds, then 43 seconds,
> then 7 seconds, then 1 second, then 0.6 seconds, then 0.2 seconds,
> then again 0.2 seconds, again 0.2 seconds, again 0.2, again 0.2, again
> 0.2, and finally after ONLY 13 builds it finds out that nothing is to
> be made...

sleep 1; mk

Russ