Been there, done that. Not a line of text saying why 9atom appeared nor why the changes are not merged back into plan9.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2011/2/13 Sergey Zhilkin <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:szhilkin@gmail.com">szhilkin@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">Hello ! :)<br><br>Go to the <a href="http://www.quanstro.net/plan9/9atom/" target="_blank">http://www.quanstro.net/plan9/9atom/</a> and read the few lines of text.<div class="im">
<br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Eugene Gorodinsky <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:e.gorodinsky@gmail.com" target="_blank">e.gorodinsky@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>

<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204);padding-left:1ex">This question has been bugging me for some time and I haven&#39;t found any discussions on the matter. It seems that at least the devices support could go into the original plan9 kernel. What&#39;s the reason for having a fork? 
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br></div>-- <br>С наилучшими пожеланиями<br>Жилкин Сергей<br>With best regards<br><font color="#888888">Zhilkin Sergey<br>
</font></blockquote></div><br>