Re: [9fans] plan 9 on the guruplug

[David Leimbach <leimy2k@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3863 bytes --]

The part that confuses me right now is the following set of comments in the
plug configuration file with respect to flash and nvram.

Do I need nvram or not?  nvram appears to be where my boot process dies.


bootdir
boot$CONF.out boot
/arm/bin/ip/ipconfig
/arm/bin/auth/factotum
# /arm/bin/paqfs
/arm/bin/usb/usbd
# nvram not needed any longer, it's in flash
nvram

link
ether1116 ethermii
archkw
ethermedium
# no flash yet for guruplug
flashkw ecc
loopbackmedium
netdevmedium
usbehci

# sheeva plug, openrd-client, guruplug and others
# based on marvell's kirkwood soc
dev
root
cons
env
pipe
proc
mnt
srv
dup
rtc
arch
ssl
tls
cap
kprof
aoe
sd
flash
# pnp pci

ether netif
ip arp chandial ip ipv6 ipaux iproute netlog nullmedium pktmedium ptclbsum
inferno

## draw screen vga vgax
## mouse mouse
## vga
# kbmap
## kbin

uart
usb


On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 8:52 PM, David Leimbach <leimy2k@gmail.com> wrote:

> plug included nvram, so I'm not sure what's going on.  Still trying to
> figure out if I should just be able to mount this thing from another machine
> to test.
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 8:48 PM, David Leimbach <leimy2k@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I just built the CONF=plug
>>
>> Let me see what that includes.  Maybe my sources are just really old.
>>
>> Dave
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 8:46 PM, Skip Tavakkolian <9nut@9netics.com>wrote:
>>
>>> do you compile in an nvram (that includes the correct rights?)
>>>
>>> > On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 7:01 PM, erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net
>>> >wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> > Just got one of these today, and I suspect my problem has nothing to
>>> do
>>> >> with
>>> >> > the guruplug and everything to do with the fact that I've never set
>>> up
>>> >> any
>>> >> > PXE bootable systems before to mount a Plan 9 CPUAUTHFS service.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > I'm getting
>>> >> > "ktrace /kernel/path 0x60806f34 0x6095cf30 0x6095cf6d # pc, sp,
>>> linkion
>>> >> > refused"
>>> >> >
>>> >> > I'm thinking that I don't have / either exported in a way I know how
>>> to
>>> >> use
>>> >> > it remotely or that I have another fundamental configuration issue.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > I'm wondering if there's a way to use either Inferno or the same
>>> plan 9
>>> >> > installation to test whatever needs testing to validate that I'll be
>>> able
>>> >> to
>>> >> > remotely boot my guruplug.
>>> >>
>>> >> once you've validated that you have a reasonable
>>> >> ipnet in /lib/ndb/local covering your network (that's
>>> >> been my problem many times; verify with ndb/ipquery
>>> >> especially that you have a fs= entry), and you've tried
>>> >> adding -Dd to bootargs (adding verbosity to
>>> >> ip/ipconfig), i usually starting hacking in debug
>>> >> messages to /sys/src/9/boot, to taste, until
>>> >> i can reduce things down to a nice consummé.
>>> >>
>>> >> if you're loading the kernel, you've gotten pretty far,
>>> >> so it sounds like dhcp/tftpd themselves are properly
>>> >> configured.
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> > Yes, the kernel loads, and prompts me for an IP for a filesystem.  I
>>> enter
>>> > one, and it goes through authid, authdom, secstore and password
>>> prompts,
>>> > then it dumps me off into kdumpland
>>> >
>>> > "ktrace /kernel/path 0x60806f34 0x6095cf30 0x6095cf6d # pc, sp,
>>> > linkion refused"
>>> >
>>> > It was pretty easy to get it this far.  I'm just wondering if I have my
>>> > filesystem server set up the way I originally thought, and if there is
>>> a way
>>> > to do some basic test of that.
>>> >
>>> > Example, can I attach an Inferno OS to my Plan 9 to validate if other
>>> Plan 9
>>> > instances *should* work.
>>> >
>>> > Dave
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >>
>>> >> bon appitit.
>>> >>
>>> >> - julia child
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 8659 bytes --]