From: hiro <23hiro@googlemail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] fs performance
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 19:48:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=Gi-Ev4JhnJWKyptxH2XQ0uee8Xp7QfbrupdZe@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimThYi5QstzFadnqqe1Xcndom5QNyYhteYzU9=v@mail.gmail.com>
What bandwidth? With a gbit I could notice a difference. But probably
the fault of the linux v9fs modules I used (half usec RTT).
On 1/10/11, Francisco J Ballesteros <nemo@lsub.org> wrote:
>>
>> Right, my results were that you get pretty much exactly the same
>> performance when you're working over a LAN whether you choose streams
>> or regular 9P. Streaming only really starts to help when you're up
>> into the multiple-millisecond RTT range.
>
> This is weird. Didn't read the thesis yet, sorry, but, do you know the
> reason?
> I think that when I measured op I found that even on lans, using get instead
> of multiple rpcs was measurable. Of course users would not notice unless
> latency
> gets higher or many rpcs add their times.
> thanks
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-10 18:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-09 17:06 erik quanstrom
2011-01-09 17:29 ` ron minnich
2011-01-09 17:51 ` John Floren
2011-01-10 18:07 ` Francisco J Ballesteros
2011-01-10 18:48 ` hiro [this message]
2011-01-10 19:06 ` erik quanstrom
2011-01-10 19:53 ` John Floren
2011-01-11 11:33 ` hiro
2011-01-09 18:31 ` erik quanstrom
2011-01-09 19:54 ` Bakul Shah
2011-01-09 20:25 ` ron minnich
2011-01-09 20:47 ` erik quanstrom
2011-01-09 21:04 ` ron minnich
2011-01-09 21:17 ` Bakul Shah
2011-01-09 21:59 ` erik quanstrom
2011-01-09 22:58 ` Charles Forsyth
2011-01-09 22:55 ` ron minnich
2011-01-09 23:50 ` Charles Forsyth
2011-01-10 3:26 ` Bakul Shah
2011-01-09 21:14 ` erik quanstrom
2011-01-09 21:38 ` Bakul Shah
2011-01-09 21:56 ` ron minnich
2011-01-09 22:02 ` erik quanstrom
2011-01-10 14:45 ` David Leimbach
2011-01-10 15:06 ` Charles Forsyth
2011-01-09 22:00 ` erik quanstrom
2011-01-10 3:57 erik quanstrom
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='AANLkTi=Gi-Ev4JhnJWKyptxH2XQ0uee8Xp7QfbrupdZe@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=23hiro@googlemail.com \
--cc=9fans@9fans.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).