From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <94b72a275de4f8e6440aa79508edb7a4@terzarima.net> <8426d01eb3f1d86b5f9e8a50efb3e8c6@ladd.quanstro.net> Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 07:27:41 +1100 Message-ID: From: Bruce Ellis To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [9fans] A little more ado about async Tclunk Topicbox-Message-UUID: 72af7228-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 back to school for roger On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 6:33 AM, roger peppe wrote: > On 29 October 2010 18:47, Bruce Ellis wrote: >> who said deadlock. it's an easily reproducible situation. rattle the >> cage is not a solution. > > sorry then, i misunderstood you. what else did you mean by "deadly embrace"? > >