From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <948e9cbd967366d058ac8a033ce93f5f@plug.quanstro.net> References: <75ea74312ad96f76de8cd4b3291ffb1d@brasstown.quanstro.net> <1e4bfd86eef85bbf4434f8ef22b6fed7@plug.quanstro.net> <948e9cbd967366d058ac8a033ce93f5f@plug.quanstro.net> Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 09:31:23 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [9fans] p9p factotum available for plan 9 From: Russ Cox To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Topicbox-Message-UUID: 7a81e8e6-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 >> Factotum doesn't answer that message. >> You need to be looking at 9pserve. > > maybe i'm missing something, but 9pserve is also the > mechanism behind plumb, and it works. =C2=A0why would > p9serve be broken, but only for factotum? =C2=A0more likely > that drawterm itself is broken? It's always hard to say which program is broken when two programs can't talk to each other. I was only trying to point out that the two programs involved are drawterm and 9pserve, not drawterm and factotum (you had made changes to factotum in hopes that would fix it). I suspect the problem has to do with the so-called 9P2000.u protocol negotiation that 9pserve supports. Russ