From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <773C7824-C50D-49EE-9CF8-74E91515F2F3@corpus-callosum.com> From: Venkatesh Srinivas Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 21:41:04 -0400 Message-ID: To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e64c1a8a4effe30494445f25 Subject: Re: [9fans] Plan9 development Topicbox-Message-UUID: 7721480e-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 --0016e64c1a8a4effe30494445f25 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > one interesting thing about that example is that if it were done again > for the Plan 9 environment, mk might well be even smaller, since > some of the existing functionality isn't really used, > or might be achieved by simpler mechanisms, or with functionality > added instead by further composition with other programs; > alternatively, it might be redone in a radically different way. > > How would you rewrite mk to be simpler? Thanks, -- vs --0016e64c1a8a4effe30494445f25 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
one interesting thing about that example is that if it were done again for the Plan 9 environment, mk might well be even smaller, since
some of the existing functionality isn't really used,
or might be achieved by simpler mechanisms, or with functionality
added instead by further composition with other programs;
alternatively, it might be redone in a radically different way.


How would you rewrite mk to be simpler?
<= div>
Thanks,
-- vs=C2=A0
--0016e64c1a8a4effe30494445f25--