From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6c51f31b2d39e9ec0ea5f2e1a9eb0b2b@terzarima.net>
References: <AANLkTi=kG6yRsA9dRxAHPwHv8XEkDBrJ6e+d3h3pJeU3@mail.gmail.com>
	<6c51f31b2d39e9ec0ea5f2e1a9eb0b2b@terzarima.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 09:13:48 -0500
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=WjAo36Vm8qDNYVvy-diVNAW5wRfz2Rcy2OKL3@mail.gmail.com>
From: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: Re: [9fans] A little more ado about async Tclunk
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 6eee139c-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 8:50 AM, Charles Forsyth <forsyth@terzarima.net> wrote:
>>Sorry that wing-commander can't package it for today.
>
> sorry old boy, it wasn't LMF: at first we thought it was a wizard wheeze, but one of the sprogs had a prang with the bally old semantics and the other brass hats ordered it back to the boffins
>

What sort of trouble?  Did one o' t' cross beams's gone out o' skew on
t' treadle?

More specifically, with the semantic restrictions that VS imposes, are
their remaining semantic problems when using this with cache-able file
systems?

       -eric