From: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] p9p factotum available for plan 9
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 10:22:51 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTik405F5QyOo+amCwMk6_NkRbpZKZb_hvjZy=+Dc@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinTA00yUuQKDWfqTH3NDgMDq4b1xmLJEY4Xw4vZ@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Russ Cox <rsc@swtch.com> wrote:
>> I don't use it from plan9ports. Not sure if Lucho is still using it
>> (or variants).
>>
>> But.... why does version negotiation muck things up? It seems like if
>> the other side isn't responding with .u then there shouldn't be any
>> issues.
>
> It just complicates everything, especially in a
> protocol multiplexer. You have to keep track
> of whether you're serving .u because it changes
> the layout of various messages and also the dir
> struct. I was happy to support the experiment but
> it sounds like the experiment has failed.
>
The complications with overloading existing operations is why we
started going with a new approach (.L). I just wanted to make sure I
understood the issues in the p9p version to make sure we aren't
repeating them.
-eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-12 16:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-03 21:13 erik quanstrom
2010-11-09 3:37 ` erik quanstrom
2010-11-09 17:41 ` David Leimbach
2010-11-09 17:51 ` erik quanstrom
2010-11-10 0:37 ` erik quanstrom
2010-11-10 1:49 ` Russ Cox
2010-11-10 6:46 ` erik quanstrom
2010-11-10 14:31 ` Russ Cox
2010-11-12 3:35 ` Noah Evans
2010-11-12 5:34 ` erik quanstrom
2010-11-12 5:46 ` Noah Evans
2010-11-12 6:03 ` Noah Evans
2010-11-12 6:19 ` Russ Cox
2010-11-12 6:25 ` Noah Evans
2010-11-12 9:07 ` EBo
2010-11-12 15:12 ` David Leimbach
2010-11-12 15:19 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2010-11-12 15:35 ` erik quanstrom
2010-11-12 15:55 ` Russ Cox
2010-11-12 16:22 ` Eric Van Hensbergen [this message]
2010-11-12 19:55 ` ron minnich
2010-11-12 20:23 ` erik quanstrom
2010-11-12 20:31 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2010-11-12 20:37 ` ron minnich
2010-11-12 20:30 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2010-11-12 20:41 ` ron minnich
2010-11-12 22:15 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2010-11-12 22:20 ` ron minnich
2010-11-12 22:36 ` Russ Cox
2010-11-13 8:31 ` tlaronde
2010-11-13 23:42 ` Dave Eckhardt
2010-11-14 22:49 ` Nathaniel W Filardo
2010-11-15 16:22 ` erik quanstrom
2010-11-15 17:40 ` Nathaniel W Filardo
2010-11-15 17:50 ` John Floren
2010-11-12 21:12 ` Russ Cox
2010-11-09 18:08 ` yy
2010-11-09 19:17 ` Bakul Shah
2010-11-09 19:27 ` Russ Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='AANLkTik405F5QyOo+amCwMk6_NkRbpZKZb_hvjZy=+Dc@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=ericvh@gmail.com \
--cc=9fans@9fans.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).